Cuba vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues

Cuba
0.0246 kt
in 2050
Sub-Saharan Africa
0.0946 kt
in 2050
Cuba rank
9th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
10th

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues over time

  • Cuba
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
0.020.040.060.080.1196120052050

How they compare

Sub-Saharan Africa currently reports 0.0946 kt against 0.0246 kt in Cuba, a difference of 0.07 kt.

That makes Sub-Saharan Africa's figure about 3.8 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 9th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 10th of 103 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 4 and Sub-Saharan Africa in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0487 kt 0.0225 kt 0.0262 kt Cuba
1970s 0.0571 kt 0.0315 kt 0.0256 kt Cuba
1980s 0.0599 kt 0.0426 kt 0.0173 kt Cuba
1990s 0.0569 kt 0.0428 kt 0.014 kt Cuba
2000s 0.0294 kt 0.0476 kt 0.0182 kt Sub-Saharan Africa
2010s 0.0189 kt 0.0535 kt 0.0345 kt Sub-Saharan Africa
2020s 0.0149 kt 0.0576 kt 0.0427 kt Sub-Saharan Africa
2030s 0.024 kt 0.0721 kt 0.0481 kt Sub-Saharan Africa
2050s 0.0246 kt 0.0946 kt 0.07 kt Sub-Saharan Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues, Cuba or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Sub-Saharan Africa, at 0.0946 kt against 0.0246 kt in Cuba as of 2050.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues between Cuba and Sub-Saharan Africa?
0.07 kt, with Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Sub-Saharan Africa?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Cuba and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues?
Cuba ranks 9th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 10th of 103 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/cuba/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/cuba/sub-saharan-africa/">Cuba vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
146 places, 8,867 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).