Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs South Africa: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O)

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
0.0418 kt
in 2050
South Africa
0.0142 kt
in 2050
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
15th
South Africa rank
15th

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O) over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • South Africa
00.010.020.030.04196120052050

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 0.0418 kt against 0.0142 kt in South Africa, a difference of 0.0276 kt.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 2.9 times South Africa's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was South Africa ahead.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 15th and South Africa ranks 15th of 29 groups.

Across the 9 decades both report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) averaged higher in 8 and South Africa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0051 kt 0.0068 kt 0.0017 kt South Africa
1970s 0.009 kt 0.0088 kt 0.0002 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1980s 0.0132 kt 0.0118 kt 0.0014 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1990s 0.016 kt 0.013 kt 0.003 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 0.0219 kt 0.0142 kt 0.0077 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 0.0312 kt 0.012 kt 0.0192 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 0.0343 kt 0.0115 kt 0.0228 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2030s 0.0319 kt 0.015 kt 0.0169 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2050s 0.0418 kt 0.0142 kt 0.0276 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or South Africa?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 0.0418 kt against 0.0142 kt in South Africa as of 2050.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and South Africa?
0.0276 kt, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and South Africa?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and South Africa rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 15th and South Africa ranks 15th of 29 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs South Africa: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/south-africa/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs South Africa: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
146 places, 8,867 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).