Middle Africa vs OECD: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues

Middle Africa
0.0162 kt
in 2050
OECD
0.0563 kt
in 2050
Middle Africa rank
5th
OECD rank
5th

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues over time

  • Middle Africa
  • OECD
00.020.040.060.08196120052050

How they compare

OECD currently reports 0.0563 kt against 0.0162 kt in Middle Africa, a difference of 0.0401 kt.

That makes OECD's figure about 3.5 times Middle Africa's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, OECD has been ahead every year.

Middle Africa ranks 5th and OECD ranks 5th of 14 groups.

OECD has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Middle Africa OECD Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0023 kt 0.0418 kt 0.0396 kt OECD
1970s 0.0045 kt 0.0493 kt 0.0448 kt OECD
1980s 0.0083 kt 0.0554 kt 0.0471 kt OECD
1990s 0.0073 kt 0.0617 kt 0.0544 kt OECD
2000s 0.0059 kt 0.0675 kt 0.0616 kt OECD
2010s 0.0061 kt 0.0696 kt 0.0635 kt OECD
2020s 0.0072 kt 0.0705 kt 0.0633 kt OECD
2030s 0.0102 kt 0.0611 kt 0.0509 kt OECD
2050s 0.0162 kt 0.0563 kt 0.0401 kt OECD

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues, Middle Africa or OECD?
OECD, at 0.0563 kt against 0.0162 kt in Middle Africa as of 2050.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues between Middle Africa and OECD?
0.0401 kt, with OECD ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Middle Africa and OECD?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Middle Africa and OECD rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues?
Middle Africa ranks 5th and OECD ranks 5th of 14 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Middle Africa vs OECD: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/middle-africa/oecd/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/middle-africa/oecd/">Middle Africa vs OECD: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
146 places, 8,867 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).