Puerto Rico vs Sri Lanka: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per capita

Puerto Rico
0 kt per person
in 2002
Sri Lanka
0 kt per person
in 2023
Puerto Rico rank
57th
Sri Lanka rank
55th

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per capita over time

  • Puerto Rico
  • Sri Lanka
0000196119922023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0 kt per person.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.2 times Puerto Rico's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 42 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Puerto Rico ahead.

Puerto Rico ranks 57th and Sri Lanka ranks 55th of 93 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Puerto Rico averaged higher in 4 and Sri Lanka in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Puerto Rico Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Puerto Rico
1970s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Puerto Rico
1980s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Puerto Rico
1990s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Puerto Rico
2000s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per capita, Puerto Rico or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Puerto Rico as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per capita between Puerto Rico and Sri Lanka?
0 kt per person, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Sri Lanka?
42 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2002.
How do Puerto Rico and Sri Lanka rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per capita?
Puerto Rico ranks 57th and Sri Lanka ranks 55th of 93 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Puerto Rico vs Sri Lanka: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-per-capita/puerto-rico-us/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-per-capita/puerto-rico-us/sri-lanka/">Puerto Rico vs Sri Lanka: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per capita
Unit
kt per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
95 places, 5,533 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.