Congo vs Zambia: Sugar cane: Burning crop residues (Emissions) … square kilometre N2O

Congo
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
51st
Zambia rank
50th

Sugar cane: Burning crop residues (Emissions) … square kilometre N2O over time

  • Congo
  • Zambia
0000196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 51st and Zambia ranks 50th of 93 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 5 and Zambia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Congo
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Congo
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Congo
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Congo
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Congo
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Zambia
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per square, Congo or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per square between Congo and Zambia?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Zambia?
58 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2023.
How do Congo and Zambia rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per square?
Congo ranks 51st and Zambia ranks 50th of 93 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Zambia: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/zambia/">Congo vs Zambia: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
95 places, 5,533 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.