Ecuador vs Malawi: Sugar cane: Burning crop residues (Emissions) … square kilometre N2O

Ecuador
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
28th
Malawi rank
27th

Sugar cane: Burning crop residues (Emissions) … square kilometre N2O over time

  • Ecuador
  • Malawi
0000196119922023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 28th and Malawi ranks 27th of 93 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Malawi Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per square, Ecuador or Malawi?
Malawi, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per square between Ecuador and Malawi?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Malawi?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Malawi rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per square?
Ecuador ranks 28th and Malawi ranks 27th of 93 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Malawi: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/malawi/">Ecuador vs Malawi: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
95 places, 5,533 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.