How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Sri Lanka?

42 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2002.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Puerto Rico vs Sri Lanka: Sugar cane: Burning crop residues (Emissions) … square kilometre N2O

Puerto Rico

0 kt per square kilometre

in 2002

Sri Lanka

0 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Puerto Rico rank

35th

Sri Lanka rank

34th

Sugar cane: Burning crop residues (Emissions) … square kilometre N2O over time

Puerto Rico
Sri Lanka

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 42 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Puerto Rico ahead.

Puerto Rico ranks 35th and Sri Lanka ranks 34th of 93 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Puerto Rico averaged higher in 4 and Sri Lanka in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Puerto Rico	Sri Lanka	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Puerto Rico
1970s	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Puerto Rico
1980s	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Puerto Rico
1990s	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Puerto Rico
2000s	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per square, Puerto Rico or Sri Lanka?: Sri Lanka, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Puerto Rico as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per square between Puerto Rico and Sri Lanka?: 0 kt per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Sri Lanka?: 42 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2002.
How do Puerto Rico and Sri Lanka rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per square?: Puerto Rico ranks 35th and Sri Lanka ranks 34th of 93 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Puerto Rico vs Sri Lanka: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/puerto-rico-us/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/puerto-rico-us/sri-lanka/">Puerto Rico vs Sri Lanka: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre
Unit: kt per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 95 places, 5,533 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 09 October 2026

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.