Puerto Rico vs Zimbabwe: Sugar cane: Burning crop residues (Emissions) … square kilometre N2O

Puerto Rico
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2002
Zimbabwe
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Puerto Rico rank
35th
Zimbabwe rank
38th

Sugar cane: Burning crop residues (Emissions) … square kilometre N2O over time

  • Puerto Rico
  • Zimbabwe
0000196119922023

How they compare

Puerto Rico currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Puerto Rico's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Puerto Rico ahead.

Puerto Rico ranks 35th and Zimbabwe ranks 38th of 93 countries.

Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Puerto Rico Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Puerto Rico
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Puerto Rico
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Puerto Rico
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Puerto Rico
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Puerto Rico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per square, Puerto Rico or Zimbabwe?
Puerto Rico, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2002.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per square between Puerto Rico and Zimbabwe?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Puerto Rico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Zimbabwe?
42 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2002.
How do Puerto Rico and Zimbabwe rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per square?
Puerto Rico ranks 35th and Zimbabwe ranks 38th of 93 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Puerto Rico vs Zimbabwe: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/puerto-rico-us/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/puerto-rico-us/zimbabwe/">Puerto Rico vs Zimbabwe: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
95 places, 5,533 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.