Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Eswatini: Synthetic Fertilizers — Direct emissions (N2O)

Democratic Republic of the Congo
0.1814 kt
in 2050
Eswatini
0.1633 kt
in 2050
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
151st
Eswatini rank
152nd

Synthetic Fertilizers — Direct emissions (N2O) over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Eswatini
00.20.40.6196120052050

How they compare

Democratic Republic of the Congo currently reports 0.1814 kt against 0.1633 kt in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0181 kt.

That makes Democratic Republic of the Congo's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 151st and Eswatini ranks 152nd of 232 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Democratic Republic of the Congo averaged higher in 3 and Eswatini in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0176 kt 0.0429 kt 0.0252 kt Eswatini
1970s 0.0629 kt 0.0734 kt 0.0106 kt Eswatini
1980s 0.0495 kt 0.1082 kt 0.0587 kt Eswatini
1990s 0.0353 kt 0.0575 kt 0.0221 kt Eswatini
2000s 0.0273 kt 0.067 kt 0.0397 kt Eswatini
2010s 0.1989 kt 0.0897 kt 0.1092 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
2020s 0.3994 kt 0.1189 kt 0.2806 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
2030s 0.0777 kt 0.1416 kt 0.0639 kt Eswatini
2050s 0.1814 kt 0.1633 kt 0.0181 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher synthetic fertilizers — direct emissions, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Eswatini?
Democratic Republic of the Congo, at 0.1814 kt against 0.1633 kt in Eswatini as of 2050.
What is the difference in synthetic fertilizers — direct emissions between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Eswatini?
0.0181 kt, with Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Eswatini?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Eswatini rank globally for synthetic fertilizers — direct emissions?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 151st and Eswatini ranks 152nd of 232 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Synthetic Fertilizers — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Eswatini: Synthetic Fertilizers — Direct emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/synthetic-fertilizers-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/synthetic-fertilizers-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/eswatini/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Eswatini: Synthetic Fertilizers — Direct emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Synthetic Fertilizers — Direct emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
265 places, 15,107 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf