Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Rwanda: Synthetic Fertilizers — Direct emissions (N2O)

Democratic Republic of the Congo
0.1814 kt
in 2050
Rwanda
0.2292 kt
in 2050
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
151st
Rwanda rank
148th

Synthetic Fertilizers — Direct emissions (N2O) over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Rwanda
00.20.40.6196120052050

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0.2292 kt against 0.1814 kt in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 0.0478 kt.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.3 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 151st and Rwanda ranks 148th of 232 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Democratic Republic of the Congo averaged higher in 7 and Rwanda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0176 kt 0.0003 kt 0.0173 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
1970s 0.0629 kt 0.0018 kt 0.0611 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
1980s 0.0495 kt 0.0086 kt 0.0409 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
1990s 0.0353 kt 0.0049 kt 0.0304 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
2000s 0.0273 kt 0.0166 kt 0.0107 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
2010s 0.1989 kt 0.0876 kt 0.1114 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
2020s 0.3994 kt 0.2095 kt 0.19 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
2030s 0.0777 kt 0.1146 kt 0.0369 kt Rwanda
2050s 0.1814 kt 0.2292 kt 0.0478 kt Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher synthetic fertilizers — direct emissions, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 0.2292 kt against 0.1814 kt in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2050.
What is the difference in synthetic fertilizers — direct emissions between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda?
0.0478 kt, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda rank globally for synthetic fertilizers — direct emissions?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 151st and Rwanda ranks 148th of 232 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Synthetic Fertilizers — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Rwanda: Synthetic Fertilizers — Direct emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/synthetic-fertilizers-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/synthetic-fertilizers-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/rwanda/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Rwanda: Synthetic Fertilizers — Direct emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Synthetic Fertilizers — Direct emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
265 places, 15,107 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf