Trinidad and Tobago vs Zimbabwe: Synthetic Fertilizers — Emissions (CO2eq), per square kilometre

Trinidad and Tobago
0.001 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0014 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago rank
103rd
Zimbabwe rank
100th

Synthetic Fertilizers — Emissions (CO2eq), per square kilometre over time

  • Trinidad and Tobago
  • Zimbabwe
00.0020.0040.0060.008196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0014 kt per square kilometre against 0.001 kt per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.0004 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.4 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Trinidad and Tobago ranks 103rd and Zimbabwe ranks 100th of 176 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Trinidad and Tobago averaged higher in 6 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Trinidad and Tobago Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0041 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre 0.0036 kt per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 0.0058 kt per square kilometre 0.0009 kt per square kilometre 0.0049 kt per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 0.0037 kt per square kilometre 0.0012 kt per square kilometre 0.0024 kt per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 0.0053 kt per square kilometre 0.0013 kt per square kilometre 0.0041 kt per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 0.0048 kt per square kilometre 0.0009 kt per square kilometre 0.0039 kt per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 0.0049 kt per square kilometre 0.0008 kt per square kilometre 0.0041 kt per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 0.0012 kt per square kilometre 0.0015 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher synthetic fertilizers — emissions (co2eq), per square kilometre, Trinidad and Tobago or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.0014 kt per square kilometre against 0.001 kt per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in synthetic fertilizers — emissions (co2eq), per square kilometre between Trinidad and Tobago and Zimbabwe?
0.0004 kt per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Trinidad and Tobago and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Trinidad and Tobago and Zimbabwe rank globally for synthetic fertilizers — emissions (co2eq), per square kilometre?
Trinidad and Tobago ranks 103rd and Zimbabwe ranks 100th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Synthetic Fertilizers — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Trinidad and Tobago vs Zimbabwe: Synthetic Fertilizers — Emissions (CO2eq), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/synthetic-fertilizers-emissions-co2eq-per-square-kilometre/trinidad-and-tobago/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/synthetic-fertilizers-emissions-co2eq-per-square-kilometre/trinidad-and-tobago/zimbabwe/">Trinidad and Tobago vs Zimbabwe: Synthetic Fertilizers — Emissions (CO2eq), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Synthetic Fertilizers — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
177 places, 9,802 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Synthetic Fertilizers — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.