Chile vs Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Terrestrial and marine protected areas

Chile
37.9%
in 2025
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
13.9%
in 2025
Chile rank
17th
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
17th

Terrestrial and marine protected areas over time

  • Chile
  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
10203040201320192025

How they compare

Chile currently reports 37.9% against 13.9% in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 24.0%.

That makes Chile's figure about 2.7 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ahead.

Chile ranks 17th and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 17th of 213 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Difference Ahead
2010s 16.1% 13.1% 2.9% Chile
2020s 37.9% 13.5% 24.4% Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher terrestrial and marine protected areas, Chile or Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
Chile, at 37.9% against 13.9% in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2025.
What is the difference in terrestrial and marine protected areas between Chile and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
24.0%, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
13 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2025.
How do Chile and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank globally for terrestrial and marine protected areas?
Chile ranks 17th and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 17th of 213 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) and World Database on Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures (WD-OECM), UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring, published as Terrestrial and marine protected areas (% of total territorial area). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Terrestrial and marine protected areas. Statizoid, drawing on Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) and World Database on Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures (WD-OECM), UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/terrestrial-and-marine-protected-areas-percent-of-total-territorial-area/chile/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/terrestrial-and-marine-protected-areas-percent-of-total-territorial-area/chile/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/">Chile vs Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Terrestrial and marine protected areas</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Terrestrial and marine protected areas (% of total territorial area)
Unit
% of total territorial area
Source
Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) and World Database on Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures (WD-OECM), UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
260 places, 3,357 data points, 2013–2025
Last refreshed

Terrestrial protected areas are totally or partially protected areas of at least 1,000 hectares that are designated by national authorities as scientific reserves with limited public access, national parks, natural monuments, nature reserves or wildlife sanctuaries, protected landscapes, and areas managed mainly for sustainable use. Marine protected areas are areas of intertidal or subtidal terrain--and overlying water and associated flora and fauna and historical and cultural features--that have been reserved by law or other effective means to protect part or all of the enclosed environment. Sites protected under local or provincial law are excluded.