East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs New Zealand: Terrestrial protected areas

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
15.0%
in 2025
New Zealand
33.4%
in 2025
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
33rd
New Zealand rank
30th

Terrestrial protected areas over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • New Zealand
0102030201320192025

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 33.4% against 15.0% in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 18.4%.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 2.2 times East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

Across all 13 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 33rd and New Zealand ranks 30th of 47 groups.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) New Zealand Difference Ahead
2010s 15.3% 31.8% 16.5% New Zealand
2020s 15.0% 33.4% 18.4% New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher terrestrial protected areas, East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 33.4% against 15.0% in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2025.
What is the difference in terrestrial protected areas between East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and New Zealand?
18.4%, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and New Zealand?
13 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2025.
How do East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and New Zealand rank globally for terrestrial protected areas?
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 33rd and New Zealand ranks 30th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) and World Database on Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures (WD-OECM), UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring, published as Terrestrial protected areas (% of total land area). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs New Zealand: Terrestrial protected areas. Statizoid, drawing on Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) and World Database on Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures (WD-OECM), UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/terrestrial-protected-areas-percent-of-total-land-area/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/terrestrial-protected-areas-percent-of-total-land-area/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/new-zealand/">East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs New Zealand: Terrestrial protected areas</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Terrestrial protected areas (% of total land area)
Unit
% of total land area
Source
Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) and World Database on Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures (WD-OECM), UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
260 places, 3,357 data points, 2013–2025
Last refreshed

Terrestrial protected areas are totally or partially protected areas of at least 1,000 hectares that are designated by national authorities as scientific reserves with limited public access, national parks, natural monuments, nature reserves or wildlife sanctuaries, protected landscapes, and areas managed mainly for sustainable use. Marine areas, unclassified areas, littoral (intertidal) areas, and sites protected under local or provincial law are excluded.