Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan vs Zimbabwe: Terrestrial protected areas

Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan
8.7%
in 2025
Zimbabwe
28.3%
in 2025
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan rank
43rd
Zimbabwe rank
46th

Terrestrial protected areas over time

  • Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan
  • Zimbabwe
51015202530201320192025

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 28.3% against 8.7% in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, a difference of 19.6%.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 3.3 times Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan's.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan ranks 43rd and Zimbabwe ranks 46th of 47 groups.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2010s 8.7% 27.2% 18.5% Zimbabwe
2020s 6.8% 27.8% 20.9% Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher terrestrial protected areas, Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 28.3% against 8.7% in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan as of 2025.
What is the difference in terrestrial protected areas between Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan and Zimbabwe?
19.6%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan and Zimbabwe?
13 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2025.
How do Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan and Zimbabwe rank globally for terrestrial protected areas?
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan ranks 43rd and Zimbabwe ranks 46th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) and World Database on Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures (WD-OECM), UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring, published as Terrestrial protected areas (% of total land area). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan vs Zimbabwe: Terrestrial protected areas. Statizoid, drawing on Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) and World Database on Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures (WD-OECM), UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/terrestrial-protected-areas-percent-of-total-land-area/middle-east-north-africa-afghanistan-and-pakistan/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/terrestrial-protected-areas-percent-of-total-land-area/middle-east-north-africa-afghanistan-and-pakistan/zimbabwe/">Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan vs Zimbabwe: Terrestrial protected areas</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Terrestrial protected areas (% of total land area)
Unit
% of total land area
Source
Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) and World Database on Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures (WD-OECM), UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
260 places, 3,357 data points, 2013–2025
Last refreshed

Terrestrial protected areas are totally or partially protected areas of at least 1,000 hectares that are designated by national authorities as scientific reserves with limited public access, national parks, natural monuments, nature reserves or wildlife sanctuaries, protected landscapes, and areas managed mainly for sustainable use. Marine areas, unclassified areas, littoral (intertidal) areas, and sites protected under local or provincial law are excluded.