Poland vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Terrestrial protected areas

Poland
39.6%
in 2025
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
17.3%
in 2025
Poland rank
17th
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank
14th

Terrestrial protected areas over time

  • Poland
  • Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
010203040201320192025

How they compare

Poland currently reports 39.6% against 17.3% in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 22.3%.

That makes Poland's figure about 2.3 times Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.

Poland ranks 17th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 14th of 213 countries.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Poland Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) Difference Ahead
2010s 36.3% 16.2% 20.1% Poland
2020s 39.6% 16.7% 22.8% Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher terrestrial protected areas, Poland or Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
Poland, at 39.6% against 17.3% in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2025.
What is the difference in terrestrial protected areas between Poland and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
22.3%, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
13 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2025.
How do Poland and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank globally for terrestrial protected areas?
Poland ranks 17th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 14th of 213 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) and World Database on Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures (WD-OECM), UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring, published as Terrestrial protected areas (% of total land area). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Poland vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Terrestrial protected areas. Statizoid, drawing on Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) and World Database on Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures (WD-OECM), UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/terrestrial-protected-areas-percent-of-total-land-area/poland/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/terrestrial-protected-areas-percent-of-total-land-area/poland/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/">Poland vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Terrestrial protected areas</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Terrestrial protected areas (% of total land area)
Unit
% of total land area
Source
Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) and World Database on Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures (WD-OECM), UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
260 places, 3,357 data points, 2013–2025
Last refreshed

Terrestrial protected areas are totally or partially protected areas of at least 1,000 hectares that are designated by national authorities as scientific reserves with limited public access, national parks, natural monuments, nature reserves or wildlife sanctuaries, protected landscapes, and areas managed mainly for sustainable use. Marine areas, unclassified areas, littoral (intertidal) areas, and sites protected under local or provincial law are excluded.