Belarus vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Total Energy — Energy use in agriculture

Belarus
49,931 TJ
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
123,111 TJ
in 2023
Belarus rank
27th
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
24th

Total Energy — Energy use in agriculture over time

  • Belarus
  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k199020062023

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 123,111 TJ against 49,931 TJ in Belarus, a difference of 73,180 TJ.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 2.5 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 27th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 24th of 169 countries.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 59,876 TJ 132,258 TJ 72,382 TJ Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 42,731 TJ 197,944 TJ 155,213 TJ Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 44,356 TJ 150,004 TJ 105,648 TJ Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 48,355 TJ 131,400 TJ 83,045 TJ Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total energy — energy use in agriculture, Belarus or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 123,111 TJ against 49,931 TJ in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in total energy — energy use in agriculture between Belarus and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
73,180 TJ, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for total energy — energy use in agriculture?
Belarus ranks 27th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 24th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Energy — Energy use in agriculture. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Total Energy — Energy use in agriculture. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/total-energy-energy-use-in-agriculture/belarus/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/total-energy-energy-use-in-agriculture/belarus/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/">Belarus vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Total Energy — Energy use in agriculture</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total Energy — Energy use in agriculture
Unit
TJ
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
217 places, 6,850 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Energy use in agriculture contains data on energy used in agriculture (including forestry, aquaculture and fisheries), for instance to operate machinery, irrigate, heat stables, operate aquaculture ponds and fishing vessels, and related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. It also includes on-farm use of, and related GHG emissions from, electricity and heat generated off-farm. Data are available by country and regional groups with global coverage and are updated annually.