Africa Eastern and Southern vs American Samoa: Urban population, per square kilometre

Africa Eastern and Southern
19.08 units per square kilometre
in 2023
American Samoa
193.34 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Africa Eastern and Southern rank
40th
American Samoa rank
40th

Urban population, per square kilometre over time

  • Africa Eastern and Southern
  • American Samoa
0100200300196119922023

How they compare

American Samoa currently reports 193.34 units per square kilometre against 19.08 units per square kilometre in Africa Eastern and Southern, a difference of 174.26 units per square kilometre.

That makes American Samoa's figure about 10.1 times Africa Eastern and Southern's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, American Samoa has been ahead every year.

Africa Eastern and Southern ranks 40th and American Samoa ranks 40th of 47 groups.

American Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Africa Eastern and Southern American Samoa Difference Ahead
1960s 2.15 units per square kilometre 53.59 units per square kilometre 51.44 units per square kilometre American Samoa
1970s 3.37 units per square kilometre 86.09 units per square kilometre 82.71 units per square kilometre American Samoa
1980s 5.46 units per square kilometre 133.55 units per square kilometre 128.09 units per square kilometre American Samoa
1990s 7.97 units per square kilometre 214.35 units per square kilometre 206.38 units per square kilometre American Samoa
2000s 11.35 units per square kilometre 248.11 units per square kilometre 236.76 units per square kilometre American Samoa
2010s 14.39 units per square kilometre 224.73 units per square kilometre 210.34 units per square kilometre American Samoa
2020s 18.06 units per square kilometre 199.74 units per square kilometre 181.68 units per square kilometre American Samoa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher urban population, per square kilometre, Africa Eastern and Southern or American Samoa?
American Samoa, at 193.34 units per square kilometre against 19.08 units per square kilometre in Africa Eastern and Southern as of 2023.
What is the difference in urban population, per square kilometre between Africa Eastern and Southern and American Samoa?
174.26 units per square kilometre, with American Samoa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Africa Eastern and Southern and American Samoa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Africa Eastern and Southern and American Samoa rank globally for urban population, per square kilometre?
Africa Eastern and Southern ranks 40th and American Samoa ranks 40th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Urban population, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Africa Eastern and Southern vs American Samoa: Urban population, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/urban-population-per-square-kilometre/africa-eastern-and-southern/american-samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/urban-population-per-square-kilometre/africa-eastern-and-southern/american-samoa/">Africa Eastern and Southern vs American Samoa: Urban population, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Urban population, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,342 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Urban population divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.