American Samoa vs Least developed countries: Urban population, per square kilometre

American Samoa
193.34 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Least developed countries
20.33 units per square kilometre
in 2023
American Samoa rank
40th
Least developed countries rank
39th

Urban population, per square kilometre over time

  • American Samoa
  • Least developed countries
0100200300196119922023

How they compare

American Samoa currently reports 193.34 units per square kilometre against 20.33 units per square kilometre in Least developed countries, a difference of 173.01 units per square kilometre.

That makes American Samoa's figure about 9.5 times Least developed countries's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, American Samoa has been ahead every year.

American Samoa ranks 40th and Least developed countries ranks 39th of 216 countries.

American Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade American Samoa Least developed countries Difference Ahead
1960s 53.59 units per square kilometre 1.81 units per square kilometre 51.78 units per square kilometre American Samoa
1970s 86.09 units per square kilometre 3.1 units per square kilometre 82.99 units per square kilometre American Samoa
1980s 133.55 units per square kilometre 5.26 units per square kilometre 128.28 units per square kilometre American Samoa
1990s 214.35 units per square kilometre 7.86 units per square kilometre 206.49 units per square kilometre American Samoa
2000s 248.11 units per square kilometre 11.58 units per square kilometre 236.53 units per square kilometre American Samoa
2010s 224.73 units per square kilometre 15.33 units per square kilometre 209.4 units per square kilometre American Samoa
2020s 199.74 units per square kilometre 19.3 units per square kilometre 180.44 units per square kilometre American Samoa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher urban population, per square kilometre, American Samoa or Least developed countries?
American Samoa, at 193.34 units per square kilometre against 20.33 units per square kilometre in Least developed countries as of 2023.
What is the difference in urban population, per square kilometre between American Samoa and Least developed countries?
173.01 units per square kilometre, with American Samoa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for American Samoa and Least developed countries?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do American Samoa and Least developed countries rank globally for urban population, per square kilometre?
American Samoa ranks 40th and Least developed countries ranks 39th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Urban population, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

American Samoa vs Least developed countries: Urban population, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/urban-population-per-square-kilometre/american-samoa/least-developed-countries-un-classification/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/urban-population-per-square-kilometre/american-samoa/least-developed-countries-un-classification/">American Samoa vs Least developed countries: Urban population, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Urban population, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,342 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Urban population divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.