Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) vs Tuvalu: Urban population, per square kilometre

Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
22.98 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Tuvalu
209.43 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank
35th
Tuvalu rank
38th

Urban population, per square kilometre over time

  • Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
  • Tuvalu
050100150200196119922023

How they compare

Tuvalu currently reports 209.43 units per square kilometre against 22.98 units per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 186.45 units per square kilometre.

That makes Tuvalu's figure about 9.1 times Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Tuvalu has been ahead every year.

Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 35th and Tuvalu ranks 38th of 47 groups.

Tuvalu has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) Tuvalu Difference Ahead
1960s 2.1 units per square kilometre 25.17 units per square kilometre 23.06 units per square kilometre Tuvalu
1970s 3.45 units per square kilometre 40.47 units per square kilometre 37.02 units per square kilometre Tuvalu
1980s 5.69 units per square kilometre 91.37 units per square kilometre 85.68 units per square kilometre Tuvalu
1990s 8.58 units per square kilometre 130.9 units per square kilometre 122.32 units per square kilometre Tuvalu
2000s 12.64 units per square kilometre 163.23 units per square kilometre 150.59 units per square kilometre Tuvalu
2010s 17.17 units per square kilometre 211.05 units per square kilometre 193.88 units per square kilometre Tuvalu
2020s 21.78 units per square kilometre 211.92 units per square kilometre 190.13 units per square kilometre Tuvalu

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher urban population, per square kilometre, Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) or Tuvalu?
Tuvalu, at 209.43 units per square kilometre against 22.98 units per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2023.
What is the difference in urban population, per square kilometre between Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) and Tuvalu?
186.45 units per square kilometre, with Tuvalu ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) and Tuvalu?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) and Tuvalu rank globally for urban population, per square kilometre?
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 35th and Tuvalu ranks 38th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Urban population, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) vs Tuvalu: Urban population, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/urban-population-per-square-kilometre/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/urban-population-per-square-kilometre/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/tuvalu/">Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) vs Tuvalu: Urban population, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Urban population, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,342 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Urban population divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.