Chad vs East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries): Urban population, per unit of GDP

Chad
0.0003 units per US$ of GDP
in 2025
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
0.0001 units per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Chad rank
29th
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
32nd

Urban population, per unit of GDP over time

  • Chad
  • East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
00.0010.0010.0020.0020.003196019922025

How they compare

Chad currently reports 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP.

That makes Chad's figure about 4.8 times East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ahead.

Chad ranks 29th and East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 32nd of 214 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 5 and East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0007 units per US$ of GDP 0.002 units per US$ of GDP 0.0013 units per US$ of GDP East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
1970s 0.0008 units per US$ of GDP 0.0011 units per US$ of GDP 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
1980s 0.001 units per US$ of GDP 0.0007 units per US$ of GDP 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP Chad
1990s 0.001 units per US$ of GDP 0.0005 units per US$ of GDP 0.0005 units per US$ of GDP Chad
2000s 0.0006 units per US$ of GDP 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP Chad
2010s 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP Chad
2020s 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP Chad

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher urban population, per unit of gdp, Chad or East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
Chad, at 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2025.
What is the difference in urban population, per unit of gdp between Chad and East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
0.0002 units per US$ of GDP, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Chad and East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank globally for urban population, per unit of gdp?
Chad ranks 29th and East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 32nd of 214 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Urban population, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries): Urban population, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/urban-population-per-unit-of-gdp/chad/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/urban-population-per-unit-of-gdp/chad/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/">Chad vs East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries): Urban population, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Urban population, per unit of GDP
Unit
units per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
262 places, 14,784 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Urban population divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.