Serbia vs Solomon Islands: Waste — Emissions (CH4), per capita
Serbia
0 kt per person
in 2023
Solomon Islands
0 kt per person
in 2023
Serbia rank
82nd
Solomon Islands rank
84th
Waste — Emissions (CH4), per capita over time
- Serbia
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0 kt per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Solomon Islands ahead.
Serbia ranks 82nd and Solomon Islands ranks 84th of 186 countries.
Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Solomon Islands |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Solomon Islands |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Solomon Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher waste — emissions (ch4), per capita, Serbia or Solomon Islands?
- Serbia, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Solomon Islands as of 2023.
- What is the difference in waste — emissions (ch4), per capita between Serbia and Solomon Islands?
- 0 kt per person, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Solomon Islands?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Serbia and Solomon Islands rank globally for waste — emissions (ch4), per capita?
- Serbia ranks 82nd and Solomon Islands ranks 84th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Waste — Emissions (CH4), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Waste — Emissions (CH4) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.