Turks and Caicos Islands vs Zimbabwe: Waste — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre
Turks and Caicos Islands
0.0001 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0001 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
159th
Zimbabwe rank
156th
Waste — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre over time
- Turks and Caicos Islands
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0001 kt per square kilometre against 0.0001 kt per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Turks and Caicos Islands's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 159th and Zimbabwe ranks 156th of 186 countries.
Turks and Caicos Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Turks and Caicos Islands | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | Turks and Caicos Islands |
| 1970s | 0.0001 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | Turks and Caicos Islands |
| 1980s | 0.0001 kt per square kilometre | 0.0001 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | Turks and Caicos Islands |
| 1990s | 0.0002 kt per square kilometre | 0.0001 kt per square kilometre | 0.0001 kt per square kilometre | Turks and Caicos Islands |
| 2000s | 0.0003 kt per square kilometre | 0.0001 kt per square kilometre | 0.0002 kt per square kilometre | Turks and Caicos Islands |
| 2010s | 0.0003 kt per square kilometre | 0.0001 kt per square kilometre | 0.0002 kt per square kilometre | Turks and Caicos Islands |
| 2020s | 0.0001 kt per square kilometre | 0.0001 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | Turks and Caicos Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher waste — emissions (ch4), per square kilometre, Turks and Caicos Islands or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 0.0001 kt per square kilometre against 0.0001 kt per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2023.
- What is the difference in waste — emissions (ch4), per square kilometre between Turks and Caicos Islands and Zimbabwe?
- 0 kt per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Turks and Caicos Islands and Zimbabwe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Turks and Caicos Islands and Zimbabwe rank globally for waste — emissions (ch4), per square kilometre?
- Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 159th and Zimbabwe ranks 156th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Waste — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Waste — Emissions (CH4) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.