Poland vs Singapore: Waste — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP
Poland
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Singapore
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Poland rank
152nd
Singapore rank
154th
Waste — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP over time
- Poland
- Singapore
How they compare
Poland currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Singapore, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.2 times Singapore's.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Poland ranks 152nd and Singapore ranks 154th of 184 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Poland |
| 2000s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Poland |
| 2010s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Poland |
| 2020s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher waste — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp, Poland or Singapore?
- Poland, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Singapore as of 2023.
- What is the difference in waste — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp between Poland and Singapore?
- 0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Singapore?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Poland and Singapore rank globally for waste — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp?
- Poland ranks 152nd and Singapore ranks 154th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Waste — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Waste — Emissions (CH4) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.