Czechoslovakia vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Waste — Emissions (CO2), annual growth rate

Czechoslovakia
11.21 % change on previous year
in 1992
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
3.07 % change on previous year
in 2023
Czechoslovakia rank
6th
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank
5th

Waste — Emissions (CO2), annual growth rate over time

  • Czechoslovakia
  • Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
020406080197119972023

How they compare

Czechoslovakia currently reports 11.21 % change on previous year against 3.07 % change on previous year in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs), a difference of 8.14 % change on previous year.

That makes Czechoslovakia's figure about 3.6 times Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ahead.

Czechoslovakia ranks 6th and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 5th of 157 countries.

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechoslovakia Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) Difference Ahead
1970s 3.05 % change on previous year 3.52 % change on previous year 0.4651 % change on previous year Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
1980s 1.27 % change on previous year 3.63 % change on previous year 2.36 % change on previous year Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
1990s 7.92 % change on previous year 12.6 % change on previous year 4.68 % change on previous year Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher waste — emissions (co2), annual growth rate, Czechoslovakia or Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
Czechoslovakia, at 11.21 % change on previous year against 3.07 % change on previous year in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) as of 1992.
What is the difference in waste — emissions (co2), annual growth rate between Czechoslovakia and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
8.14 % change on previous year, with Czechoslovakia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
22 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 1992.
How do Czechoslovakia and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank globally for waste — emissions (co2), annual growth rate?
Czechoslovakia ranks 6th and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 5th of 157 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Waste — Emissions (CO2), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechoslovakia vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Waste — Emissions (CO2), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/waste-emissions-co2-annual-growth-rate/czechoslovakia/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/waste-emissions-co2-annual-growth-rate/czechoslovakia/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/">Czechoslovakia vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Waste — Emissions (CO2), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Waste — Emissions (CO2), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 8,415 data points, 1971–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Waste — Emissions (CO2). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.