Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Russia: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2.53 % change on previous year
in 2023
Russia
3.63 % change on previous year
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
9th
Russia rank
8th

Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Russia
-5051015196219922023

How they compare

Russia currently reports 3.63 % change on previous year against 2.53 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 1.1 % change on previous year.

That makes Russia's figure about 1.4 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 9th and Russia ranks 8th of 33 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 3 and Russia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Russia Difference Ahead
1990s 2.33 % change on previous year -0.4139 % change on previous year 2.74 % change on previous year Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 3.3 % change on previous year 2.93 % change on previous year 0.3714 % change on previous year Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 2.84 % change on previous year 2.75 % change on previous year 0.0956 % change on previous year Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 2.36 % change on previous year 3.29 % change on previous year 0.9321 % change on previous year Russia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher waste — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual growth rate, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Russia?
Russia, at 3.63 % change on previous year against 2.53 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in waste — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual growth rate between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Russia?
1.1 % change on previous year, with Russia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Russia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Russia rank globally for waste — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual growth rate?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 9th and Russia ranks 8th of 33 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Russia: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/waste-emissions-co2eq-ar5-annual-growth-rate/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/russian-federation/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/waste-emissions-co2eq-ar5-annual-growth-rate/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/russian-federation/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Russia: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
265 places, 15,001 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.