Afghanistan vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre

Afghanistan
0.0035 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
0.0037 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Afghanistan rank
160th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
159th

Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
00.0020.0040.0060.0080.01196119922023

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 0.0037 kt per square kilometre against 0.0035 kt per square kilometre in Afghanistan, a difference of 0.0002 kt per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Turks and Caicos Islands has been ahead every year.

Afghanistan ranks 160th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 159th of 186 countries.

Turks and Caicos Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0008 kt per square kilometre 0.0012 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
1970s 0.0008 kt per square kilometre 0.0017 kt per square kilometre 0.0009 kt per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
1980s 0.0009 kt per square kilometre 0.0029 kt per square kilometre 0.002 kt per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
1990s 0.0012 kt per square kilometre 0.0056 kt per square kilometre 0.0044 kt per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2000s 0.0019 kt per square kilometre 0.0078 kt per square kilometre 0.0059 kt per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s 0.0028 kt per square kilometre 0.0079 kt per square kilometre 0.0051 kt per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s 0.0034 kt per square kilometre 0.0045 kt per square kilometre 0.0011 kt per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher waste — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre, Afghanistan or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 0.0037 kt per square kilometre against 0.0035 kt per square kilometre in Afghanistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in waste — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre between Afghanistan and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.0002 kt per square kilometre, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Turks and Caicos Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Afghanistan and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for waste — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre?
Afghanistan ranks 160th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 159th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/waste-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/afghanistan/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/waste-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/afghanistan/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Afghanistan vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 10,734 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.