Bhutan vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre

Bhutan
0.004 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
0.0037 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan rank
158th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
159th

Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • Bhutan
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
00.0020.0040.0060.0080.01196119922023

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 0.004 kt per square kilometre against 0.0037 kt per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0.0003 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.1 times Turks and Caicos Islands's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

Bhutan ranks 158th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 159th of 186 countries.

Turks and Caicos Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0005 kt per square kilometre 0.0012 kt per square kilometre 0.0007 kt per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
1970s 0.0003 kt per square kilometre 0.0017 kt per square kilometre 0.0014 kt per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
1980s 0.0005 kt per square kilometre 0.0029 kt per square kilometre 0.0023 kt per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
1990s 0.0008 kt per square kilometre 0.0056 kt per square kilometre 0.0047 kt per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2000s 0.0017 kt per square kilometre 0.0078 kt per square kilometre 0.0061 kt per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s 0.0029 kt per square kilometre 0.0079 kt per square kilometre 0.005 kt per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s 0.0038 kt per square kilometre 0.0045 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher waste — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre, Bhutan or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Bhutan, at 0.004 kt per square kilometre against 0.0037 kt per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in waste — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre between Bhutan and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.0003 kt per square kilometre, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Turks and Caicos Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for waste — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre?
Bhutan ranks 158th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 159th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/waste-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/waste-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Bhutan vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 10,734 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.