Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs New Zealand: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), annual growth rate
Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), annual growth rate over time
- Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
- New Zealand
How they compare
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in New Zealand, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 18 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was New Zealand ahead.
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 180th and New Zealand ranks 180th of 232 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.99 % change on previous year | 6.31 % change on previous year | 3.32 % change on previous year | New Zealand |
| 1970s | 0.5353 % change on previous year | 0.9302 % change on previous year | 0.3949 % change on previous year | New Zealand |
| 1980s | 0.6009 % change on previous year | 0.64 % change on previous year | 0.0391 % change on previous year | New Zealand |
| 1990s | -1.91 % change on previous year | 1.54 % change on previous year | 3.45 % change on previous year | New Zealand |
| 2000s | -2.66 % change on previous year | 0.2446 % change on previous year | 2.91 % change on previous year | New Zealand |
| 2010s | -0.3281 % change on previous year | -0.1622 % change on previous year | 0.1659 % change on previous year | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 0 % change on previous year | -0.2826 % change on previous year | 0.2826 % change on previous year | Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher waste — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5), annual growth rate, Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha or New Zealand?
- Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha, at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in New Zealand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in waste — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5), annual growth rate between Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and New Zealand?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and New Zealand?
- 62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
- How do Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and New Zealand rank globally for waste — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5), annual growth rate?
- Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 180th and New Zealand ranks 180th of 232 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.