Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Papua New Guinea: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5)

Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
778.4 kt
in 2023
Papua New Guinea
823.2 kt
in 2023
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) rank
147th
Papua New Guinea rank
145th

Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) over time

  • Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
  • Papua New Guinea
200400600800196119922023

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 823.2 kt against 778.4 kt in Bolivia (Plurinational State of), a difference of 44.8 kt.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Bolivia (Plurinational State of)'s.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ahead.

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 147th and Papua New Guinea ranks 145th of 232 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bolivia (Plurinational State of) averaged higher in 4 and Papua New Guinea in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 300.47 kt 251.22 kt 49.25 kt Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
1970s 325.98 kt 320.32 kt 5.66 kt Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
1980s 418.04 kt 378.56 kt 39.48 kt Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
1990s 468.44 kt 434 kt 34.44 kt Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
2000s 516.6 kt 546.56 kt 29.96 kt Papua New Guinea
2010s 658 kt 692.72 kt 34.72 kt Papua New Guinea
2020s 754.6 kt 800.8 kt 46.2 kt Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher waste — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, Bolivia (Plurinational State of) or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 823.2 kt against 778.4 kt in Bolivia (Plurinational State of) as of 2023.
What is the difference in waste — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Papua New Guinea?
44.8 kt, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Papua New Guinea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Papua New Guinea rank globally for waste — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 147th and Papua New Guinea ranks 145th of 232 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Papua New Guinea: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 07 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/waste-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/waste-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/papua-new-guinea/">Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Papua New Guinea: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
265 places, 15,268 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf