China, Hong Kong SAR vs Jordan: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4

China, Hong Kong SAR
4,648 kt
in 2023
Jordan
4,620 kt
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
56th
Jordan rank
57th

Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Jordan
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k196119922023

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 4,648 kt against 4,620 kt in Jordan, a difference of 28 kt.

Across all 63 years both countries report, China, Hong Kong SAR has been ahead every year.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 56th and Jordan ranks 57th of 201 countries.

China, Hong Kong SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Jordan Difference Ahead
1960s 1,262 kt 271.07 kt 990.8 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 1,949 kt 493.36 kt 1,455 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 2,641 kt 799.96 kt 1,841 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1990s 3,399 kt 1,440 kt 1,959 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 3,850 kt 2,158 kt 1,692 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 4,259 kt 3,612 kt 646.8 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 4,578 kt 4,466 kt 112 kt China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher waste — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, China, Hong Kong SAR or Jordan?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 4,648 kt against 4,620 kt in Jordan as of 2023.
What is the difference in waste — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between China, Hong Kong SAR and Jordan?
28 kt, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Jordan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Jordan rank globally for waste — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 56th and Jordan ranks 57th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Jordan: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/waste-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/china-hong-kong-sar/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/waste-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/china-hong-kong-sar/jordan/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Jordan: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
253 places, 14,574 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf