Georgia vs Serbia: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5)
Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) over time
- Georgia
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 1,638 kt against 1,635 kt in Georgia, a difference of 3 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 120th and Serbia ranks 119th of 232 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,550 kt | 1,634 kt | 84 kt | Serbia |
| 2010s | 1,505 kt | 1,637 kt | 131.88 kt | Serbia |
| 2020s | 1,609 kt | 1,631 kt | 21.7 kt | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher waste — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, Georgia or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 1,638 kt against 1,635 kt in Georgia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in waste — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between Georgia and Serbia?
- 3 kt, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Serbia rank globally for waste — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
- Georgia ranks 120th and Serbia ranks 119th of 232 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf