Serbia vs South Sudan: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5)
Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) over time
- Serbia
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 1,694 kt against 1,638 kt in Serbia, a difference of 56 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Serbia ahead.
Serbia ranks 119th and South Sudan ranks 118th of 232 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1,636 kt | 1,518 kt | 117.25 kt | Serbia |
| 2020s | 1,631 kt | 1,610 kt | 21 kt | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher waste — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, Serbia or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 1,694 kt against 1,638 kt in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in waste — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between Serbia and South Sudan?
- 56 kt, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Serbia and South Sudan rank globally for waste — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
- Serbia ranks 119th and South Sudan ranks 118th of 232 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf