Syrian Arab Republic vs United Republic of Tanzania: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4

Syrian Arab Republic
1,022 kt
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
3,192 kt
in 2023
Syrian Arab Republic rank
14th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
11th

Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 over time

  • Syrian Arab Republic
  • United Republic of Tanzania
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k196119922023

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 3,192 kt against 1,022 kt in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 2,170 kt.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 3.1 times Syrian Arab Republic's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Syrian Arab Republic ahead.

Syrian Arab Republic ranks 14th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 11th of 20 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Syrian Arab Republic averaged higher in 6 and United Republic of Tanzania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Syrian Arab Republic United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 730.8 kt 436.8 kt 294 kt Syrian Arab Republic
1970s 1,115 kt 524.44 kt 590.24 kt Syrian Arab Republic
1980s 1,604 kt 953.4 kt 651 kt Syrian Arab Republic
1990s 1,896 kt 1,361 kt 535.64 kt Syrian Arab Republic
2000s 3,637 kt 1,584 kt 2,053 kt Syrian Arab Republic
2010s 3,994 kt 2,316 kt 1,678 kt Syrian Arab Republic
2020s 1,307 kt 3,024 kt 1,717 kt United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher waste — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, Syrian Arab Republic or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 3,192 kt against 1,022 kt in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in waste — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between Syrian Arab Republic and United Republic of Tanzania?
2,170 kt, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Syrian Arab Republic and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Syrian Arab Republic and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for waste — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
Syrian Arab Republic ranks 14th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 11th of 20 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Syrian Arab Republic vs United Republic of Tanzania: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/waste-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/syrian-arab-republic-2/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/waste-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/syrian-arab-republic-2/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Syrian Arab Republic vs United Republic of Tanzania: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
253 places, 14,574 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf