Turks and Caicos Islands vs Zimbabwe: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per square kilometre
Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per square kilometre over time
- Turks and Caicos Islands
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0039 kt per square kilometre against 0.0033 kt per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0.0006 kt per square kilometre.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Turks and Caicos Islands's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 159th and Zimbabwe ranks 156th of 186 countries.
Turks and Caicos Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Turks and Caicos Islands | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0011 kt per square kilometre | 0.0007 kt per square kilometre | 0.0004 kt per square kilometre | Turks and Caicos Islands |
| 1970s | 0.0015 kt per square kilometre | 0.001 kt per square kilometre | 0.0005 kt per square kilometre | Turks and Caicos Islands |
| 1980s | 0.0027 kt per square kilometre | 0.0018 kt per square kilometre | 0.0009 kt per square kilometre | Turks and Caicos Islands |
| 1990s | 0.0054 kt per square kilometre | 0.0027 kt per square kilometre | 0.0027 kt per square kilometre | Turks and Caicos Islands |
| 2000s | 0.0075 kt per square kilometre | 0.0029 kt per square kilometre | 0.0046 kt per square kilometre | Turks and Caicos Islands |
| 2010s | 0.0076 kt per square kilometre | 0.0033 kt per square kilometre | 0.0043 kt per square kilometre | Turks and Caicos Islands |
| 2020s | 0.0041 kt per square kilometre | 0.0038 kt per square kilometre | 0.0003 kt per square kilometre | Turks and Caicos Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher waste — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5), per square kilometre, Turks and Caicos Islands or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 0.0039 kt per square kilometre against 0.0033 kt per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2023.
- What is the difference in waste — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5), per square kilometre between Turks and Caicos Islands and Zimbabwe?
- 0.0006 kt per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Turks and Caicos Islands and Zimbabwe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Turks and Caicos Islands and Zimbabwe rank globally for waste — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5), per square kilometre?
- Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 159th and Zimbabwe ranks 156th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.