China, Macao SAR vs Latvia: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), annual growth rate

China, Macao SAR
0.4695 % change on previous year
in 2023
Latvia
0.4902 % change on previous year
in 2023
China, Macao SAR rank
184th
Latvia rank
183rd

Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), annual growth rate over time

  • China, Macao SAR
  • Latvia
-50510196219922023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 0.4902 % change on previous year against 0.4695 % change on previous year in China, Macao SAR, a difference of 0.0207 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1993 it was China, Macao SAR ahead.

China, Macao SAR ranks 184th and Latvia ranks 183rd of 232 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, China, Macao SAR averaged higher in 3 and Latvia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Macao SAR Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 1.38 % change on previous year -4.14 % change on previous year 5.52 % change on previous year China, Macao SAR
2000s 4.76 % change on previous year 1.1 % change on previous year 3.66 % change on previous year China, Macao SAR
2010s 3.37 % change on previous year 0.697 % change on previous year 2.68 % change on previous year China, Macao SAR
2020s 0.0597 % change on previous year 1.39 % change on previous year 1.33 % change on previous year Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher waste — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), annual growth rate, China, Macao SAR or Latvia?
Latvia, at 0.4902 % change on previous year against 0.4695 % change on previous year in China, Macao SAR as of 2023.
What is the difference in waste — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), annual growth rate between China, Macao SAR and Latvia?
0.0207 % change on previous year, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Macao SAR and Latvia?
30 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do China, Macao SAR and Latvia rank globally for waste — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), annual growth rate?
China, Macao SAR ranks 184th and Latvia ranks 183rd of 232 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Macao SAR vs Latvia: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/waste-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-annual-growth-rate/china-macao-sar/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/waste-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-annual-growth-rate/china-macao-sar/latvia/">China, Macao SAR vs Latvia: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
265 places, 15,000 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.