China, Macao SAR vs East Timor: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), annual growth rate

China, Macao SAR
0.4695 % change on previous year
in 2023
East Timor
0.4202 % change on previous year
in 2023
China, Macao SAR rank
184th
East Timor rank
187th

Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), annual growth rate over time

  • China, Macao SAR
  • East Timor
-10-50510196219922023

How they compare

China, Macao SAR currently reports 0.4695 % change on previous year against 0.4202 % change on previous year in East Timor, a difference of 0.0493 % change on previous year.

That makes China, Macao SAR's figure about 1.1 times East Timor's.

The two have swapped places 22 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1962 it was China, Macao SAR ahead.

China, Macao SAR ranks 184th and East Timor ranks 187th of 232 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China, Macao SAR averaged higher in 6 and East Timor in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Macao SAR East Timor Difference Ahead
1960s 4.57 % change on previous year 4.56 % change on previous year 0.0117 % change on previous year China, Macao SAR
1970s -0.3388 % change on previous year -1.46 % change on previous year 1.13 % change on previous year China, Macao SAR
1980s 3.66 % change on previous year 1.39 % change on previous year 2.27 % change on previous year China, Macao SAR
1990s 2.24 % change on previous year 1.31 % change on previous year 0.9323 % change on previous year China, Macao SAR
2000s 4.76 % change on previous year 3.56 % change on previous year 1.2 % change on previous year China, Macao SAR
2010s 3.37 % change on previous year 1.9 % change on previous year 1.48 % change on previous year China, Macao SAR
2020s 0.0597 % change on previous year 1.76 % change on previous year 1.7 % change on previous year East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher waste — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), annual growth rate, China, Macao SAR or East Timor?
China, Macao SAR, at 0.4695 % change on previous year against 0.4202 % change on previous year in East Timor as of 2023.
What is the difference in waste — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), annual growth rate between China, Macao SAR and East Timor?
0.0493 % change on previous year, with China, Macao SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Macao SAR and East Timor?
61 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do China, Macao SAR and East Timor rank globally for waste — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), annual growth rate?
China, Macao SAR ranks 184th and East Timor ranks 187th of 232 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Macao SAR vs East Timor: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/waste-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-annual-growth-rate/china-macao-sar/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/waste-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-annual-growth-rate/china-macao-sar/timor-leste/">China, Macao SAR vs East Timor: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
265 places, 15,000 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.