Cuba vs Holy See: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), annual growth rate

Cuba
-2.21 % change on previous year
in 2023
Holy See
-1.72 % change on previous year
in 2023
Cuba rank
232nd
Holy See rank
229th

Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), annual growth rate over time

  • Cuba
  • Holy See
-10-505196219922023

How they compare

Holy See currently reports -1.72 % change on previous year against -2.21 % change on previous year in Cuba, a difference of 0.49 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 20 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Holy See ahead.

Cuba ranks 232nd and Holy See ranks 229th of 232 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 6 and Holy See in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Holy See Difference Ahead
1960s 4.54 % change on previous year 4.53 % change on previous year 0.0094 % change on previous year Cuba
1970s 1.19 % change on previous year 0.5335 % change on previous year 0.6575 % change on previous year Cuba
1980s 1.73 % change on previous year -0.1329 % change on previous year 1.86 % change on previous year Cuba
1990s 1.3 % change on previous year 0.7816 % change on previous year 0.5183 % change on previous year Cuba
2000s 1.58 % change on previous year -0.4722 % change on previous year 2.05 % change on previous year Cuba
2010s -0.883 % change on previous year -1.73 % change on previous year 0.8472 % change on previous year Cuba
2020s -2.87 % change on previous year -1.27 % change on previous year 1.59 % change on previous year Holy See

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher waste — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), annual growth rate, Cuba or Holy See?
Holy See, at -1.72 % change on previous year against -2.21 % change on previous year in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in waste — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), annual growth rate between Cuba and Holy See?
0.49 % change on previous year, with Holy See ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Holy See?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Holy See rank globally for waste — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), annual growth rate?
Cuba ranks 232nd and Holy See ranks 229th of 232 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Holy See: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/waste-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-annual-growth-rate/cuba/holy-see/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/waste-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-annual-growth-rate/cuba/holy-see/">Cuba vs Holy See: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
265 places, 15,000 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.