Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), annual growth rate

Ecuador
1.09 % change on previous year
in 2023
Zimbabwe
1.1 % change on previous year
in 2023
Ecuador rank
155th
Zimbabwe rank
154th

Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), annual growth rate over time

  • Ecuador
  • Zimbabwe
-50510196219922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 1.1 % change on previous year against 1.09 % change on previous year in Ecuador, a difference of 0.01 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 25 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 155th and Zimbabwe ranks 154th of 232 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 4.58 % change on previous year 4.53 % change on previous year 0.0452 % change on previous year Ecuador
1970s 2.33 % change on previous year 2.45 % change on previous year 0.1204 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
1980s 2.81 % change on previous year 2.58 % change on previous year 0.2291 % change on previous year Ecuador
1990s 3.73 % change on previous year 0.8036 % change on previous year 2.93 % change on previous year Ecuador
2000s 2.53 % change on previous year 2.82 % change on previous year 0.2941 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2010s 1.68 % change on previous year 2.27 % change on previous year 0.5882 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2020s 1.47 % change on previous year 1.66 % change on previous year 0.1898 % change on previous year Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher waste — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), annual growth rate, Ecuador or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 1.1 % change on previous year against 1.09 % change on previous year in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in waste — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), annual growth rate between Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
0.01 % change on previous year, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Zimbabwe rank globally for waste — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), annual growth rate?
Ecuador ranks 155th and Zimbabwe ranks 154th of 232 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/waste-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-annual-growth-rate/ecuador/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/waste-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-annual-growth-rate/ecuador/zimbabwe/">Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
265 places, 15,000 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.