Canada vs Latvia: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per capita
Canada
0 kt per person
in 2023
Latvia
0 kt per person
in 2023
Canada rank
20th
Latvia rank
18th
Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per capita over time
- Canada
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Canada, a difference of 0 kt per person.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Canada ranks 20th and Latvia ranks 18th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 3 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Canada |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Canada |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Canada |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher waste — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per capita, Canada or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Canada as of 2023.
- What is the difference in waste — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per capita between Canada and Latvia?
- 0 kt per person, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Canada and Latvia rank globally for waste — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per capita?
- Canada ranks 20th and Latvia ranks 18th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.