Belarus vs Ecuador: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre

Belarus
0.0008 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador
0.0008 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
123rd
Ecuador rank
122nd

Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • Belarus
  • Ecuador
000.0010.001196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0.0008 kt per square kilometre against 0.0008 kt per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 123rd and Ecuador ranks 122nd of 186 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Ecuador in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Ecuador Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0008 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre Belarus
2000s 0.0007 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre Belarus
2010s 0.0007 kt per square kilometre 0.0007 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 0.0008 kt per square kilometre 0.0008 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher waste — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per square kilometre, Belarus or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 0.0008 kt per square kilometre against 0.0008 kt per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in waste — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per square kilometre between Belarus and Ecuador?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Ecuador?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Ecuador rank globally for waste — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per square kilometre?
Belarus ranks 123rd and Ecuador ranks 122nd of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Ecuador: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/waste-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belarus/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/waste-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belarus/ecuador/">Belarus vs Ecuador: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 10,734 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.