Gambia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre

Gambia
0.0025 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
0.0023 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia rank
60th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
63rd

Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • Gambia
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0.0010.0010.0020.0020.003196119922023

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 0.0025 kt per square kilometre against 0.0023 kt per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.0002 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Gambia's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Gambia ranks 60th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 63rd of 186 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 2 and Sao Tome and Principe in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0003 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1970s 0.0004 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1980s 0.0006 kt per square kilometre 0.0008 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 0.0009 kt per square kilometre 0.0011 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 0.0014 kt per square kilometre 0.0015 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 0.002 kt per square kilometre 0.0018 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre Gambia
2020s 0.0025 kt per square kilometre 0.0022 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher waste — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per square kilometre, Gambia or Sao Tome and Principe?
Gambia, at 0.0025 kt per square kilometre against 0.0023 kt per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
What is the difference in waste — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per square kilometre between Gambia and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.0002 kt per square kilometre, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Sao Tome and Principe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Gambia and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for waste — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per square kilometre?
Gambia ranks 60th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 63rd of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gambia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/waste-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-per-square-kilometre/gambia-the/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/waste-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-per-square-kilometre/gambia-the/sao-tome-and-principe/">Gambia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 10,734 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.