How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Morocco?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Malaysia vs Morocco: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre

Malaysia

0.0015 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Morocco

0.0015 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Malaysia rank

87th

Morocco rank

89th

Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre over time

Malaysia
Morocco

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 0.0015 kt per square kilometre against 0.0015 kt per square kilometre in Morocco, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Morocco ahead.

Malaysia ranks 87th and Morocco ranks 89th of 186 countries.

Morocco has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Malaysia	Morocco	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0002 kt per square kilometre	0.0003 kt per square kilometre	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	Morocco
1970s	0.0004 kt per square kilometre	0.0004 kt per square kilometre	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	Morocco
1980s	0.0005 kt per square kilometre	0.0006 kt per square kilometre	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	Morocco
1990s	0.0008 kt per square kilometre	0.0008 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Morocco
2000s	0.001 kt per square kilometre	0.001 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Morocco
2010s	0.0012 kt per square kilometre	0.0013 kt per square kilometre	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	Morocco
2020s	0.0014 kt per square kilometre	0.0014 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Morocco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher waste — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per square kilometre, Malaysia or Morocco?: Malaysia, at 0.0015 kt per square kilometre against 0.0015 kt per square kilometre in Morocco as of 2023.
What is the difference in waste — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per square kilometre between Malaysia and Morocco?: 0 kt per square kilometre, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Morocco?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malaysia and Morocco rank globally for waste — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per square kilometre?: Malaysia ranks 87th and Morocco ranks 89th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malaysia vs Morocco: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/waste-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-per-square-kilometre/malaysia/morocco/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/waste-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-per-square-kilometre/malaysia/morocco/">Malaysia vs Morocco: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit: kt per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 187 places, 10,734 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 21 September 2026

Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.