Norway vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre

Norway
0.0004 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
0.0004 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway rank
149th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
147th

Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • Norway
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
0000196119922023

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 0.0004 kt per square kilometre against 0.0004 kt per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.1 times Norway's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Norway ahead.

Norway ranks 149th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 147th of 186 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Norway averaged higher in 6 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Norway Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Norway
1970s 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Norway
1980s 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Norway
1990s 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Norway
2000s 0.0003 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Norway
2010s 0.0004 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Norway
2020s 0.0004 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher waste — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per square kilometre, Norway or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 0.0004 kt per square kilometre against 0.0004 kt per square kilometre in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in waste — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per square kilometre between Norway and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Turks and Caicos Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Norway and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for waste — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per square kilometre?
Norway ranks 149th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 147th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Norway vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/waste-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-per-square-kilometre/norway/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/waste-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-per-square-kilometre/norway/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Norway vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 10,734 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.