Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Tuvalu: Waste — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate

Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2.46 % change on previous year
in 2023
Tuvalu
25 % change on previous year
in 2023
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
3rd
Tuvalu rank
1st

Waste — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
  • Tuvalu
01020304050196219922023

How they compare

Tuvalu currently reports 25 % change on previous year against 2.46 % change on previous year in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), a difference of 22.54 % change on previous year.

That makes Tuvalu's figure about 10.2 times Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ahead.

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 3rd and Tuvalu ranks 1st of 33 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) averaged higher in 4 and Tuvalu in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Tuvalu Difference Ahead
1960s 4.55 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 4.55 % change on previous year Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
1970s 2.78 % change on previous year 5 % change on previous year 2.22 % change on previous year Tuvalu
1980s 2.72 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 2.72 % change on previous year Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
1990s 3.23 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 3.23 % change on previous year Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2000s 3.82 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 3.82 % change on previous year Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2010s 3.15 % change on previous year 3.33 % change on previous year 0.1861 % change on previous year Tuvalu
2020s 2.53 % change on previous year 6.25 % change on previous year 3.72 % change on previous year Tuvalu

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher waste — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) or Tuvalu?
Tuvalu, at 25 % change on previous year against 2.46 % change on previous year in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in waste — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate between Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Tuvalu?
22.54 % change on previous year, with Tuvalu ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Tuvalu?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Tuvalu rank globally for waste — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate?
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 3rd and Tuvalu ranks 1st of 33 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Waste — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Tuvalu: Waste — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/waste-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/least-developed-countries-ldcs/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/waste-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/least-developed-countries-ldcs/tuvalu/">Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Tuvalu: Waste — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Waste — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
265 places, 14,893 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Waste — Emissions (N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.