Ecuador vs Montenegro: Waste — Emissions per capita
Ecuador
0.26 t CO2eq/cap
in 2023
Montenegro
0.26 t CO2eq/cap
in 2023
Ecuador rank
90th
Montenegro rank
90th
Waste — Emissions per capita over time
- Ecuador
- Montenegro
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0.26 t CO2eq/cap against 0.26 t CO2eq/cap in Montenegro, a difference of 0 t CO2eq/cap.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 90th and Montenegro ranks 90th of 208 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Montenegro in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.25 t CO2eq/cap | 0.2325 t CO2eq/cap | 0.0175 t CO2eq/cap | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 0.249 t CO2eq/cap | 0.266 t CO2eq/cap | 0.017 t CO2eq/cap | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 0.255 t CO2eq/cap | 0.27 t CO2eq/cap | 0.015 t CO2eq/cap | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher waste — emissions per capita, Ecuador or Montenegro?
- Ecuador, at 0.26 t CO2eq/cap against 0.26 t CO2eq/cap in Montenegro as of 2023.
- What is the difference in waste — emissions per capita between Ecuador and Montenegro?
- 0 t CO2eq/cap, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Montenegro?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Montenegro rank globally for waste — emissions per capita?
- Ecuador ranks 90th and Montenegro ranks 90th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Waste — Emissions per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions indicators disseminates indicators on sectoral shares of total national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as three indicators of emissions intensity: per capita emissions; emissions per value of agricultural production; and emissions per area of agricultural land.