Central America vs China, Hong Kong SAR: Waste — Emissions Share
Waste — Emissions Share over time
- Central America
- China, Hong Kong SAR
How they compare
China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 97.04 % against 39.22 % in Central America, a difference of 57.82 %.
That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 2.5 times Central America's.
Across all 34 years both countries report, China, Hong Kong SAR has been ahead every year.
Central America ranks 1st and China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 1st of 32 groups.
China, Hong Kong SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central America | China, Hong Kong SAR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 30.15 % | 96.28 % | 66.12 % | China, Hong Kong SAR |
| 2000s | 33.81 % | 96.21 % | 62.4 % | China, Hong Kong SAR |
| 2010s | 36.63 % | 96.88 % | 60.26 % | China, Hong Kong SAR |
| 2020s | 39.13 % | 97.06 % | 57.92 % | China, Hong Kong SAR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher waste — emissions share, Central America or China, Hong Kong SAR?
- China, Hong Kong SAR, at 97.04 % against 39.22 % in Central America as of 2023.
- What is the difference in waste — emissions share between Central America and China, Hong Kong SAR?
- 57.82 %, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central America and China, Hong Kong SAR?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Central America and China, Hong Kong SAR rank globally for waste — emissions share?
- Central America ranks 1st and China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 1st of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Waste — Emissions Share (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions indicators disseminates indicators on sectoral shares of total national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as three indicators of emissions intensity: per capita emissions; emissions per value of agricultural production; and emissions per area of agricultural land.