Ecuador vs Mauritania: Waste — Emissions Share (CO2eq)

Ecuador
5.37 %
in 2023
Mauritania
5.31 %
in 2023
Ecuador rank
91st
Mauritania rank
93rd

Waste — Emissions Share (CO2eq) over time

  • Ecuador
  • Mauritania
0246199020062023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 5.37 % against 5.31 % in Mauritania, a difference of 0.06 %.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mauritania ahead.

Ecuador ranks 91st and Mauritania ranks 93rd of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Mauritania in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Mauritania Difference Ahead
1990s 3.3 % 4.36 % 1.06 % Mauritania
2000s 4.09 % 4.29 % 0.203 % Mauritania
2010s 4.4 % 4.86 % 0.464 % Mauritania
2020s 5.3 % 5.13 % 0.1675 % Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher waste — emissions share (co2eq), Ecuador or Mauritania?
Ecuador, at 5.37 % against 5.31 % in Mauritania as of 2023.
What is the difference in waste — emissions share (co2eq) between Ecuador and Mauritania?
0.06 %, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Mauritania?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Mauritania rank globally for waste — emissions share (co2eq)?
Ecuador ranks 91st and Mauritania ranks 93rd of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Waste — Emissions Share (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Waste — Emissions Share (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
242 places, 8,008 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions indicators disseminates indicators on sectoral shares of total national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as three indicators of emissions intensity: per capita emissions; emissions per value of agricultural production; and emissions per area of agricultural land.