New Caledonia vs Tunisia: Wheat — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4), annual growth rate

New Caledonia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2022
Tunisia
-43.18 % change on previous year
in 2023
New Caledonia rank
129th
Tunisia rank
128th

Wheat — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4), annual growth rate over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Tunisia
-1000100200196219922023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports -43.18 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in New Caledonia, a difference of 56.82 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Tunisia ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 129th and Tunisia ranks 128th of 135 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s -100 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 100 % change on previous year Tunisia
1980s 28.83 % change on previous year 6.29 % change on previous year 22.55 % change on previous year New Caledonia
1990s -18.75 % change on previous year 21.95 % change on previous year 40.7 % change on previous year Tunisia
2020s -16.67 % change on previous year -3.39 % change on previous year 13.28 % change on previous year Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher wheat — burning crop residues (emissions ch4), annual growth rate, New Caledonia or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at -43.18 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in New Caledonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in wheat — burning crop residues (emissions ch4), annual growth rate between New Caledonia and Tunisia?
56.82 % change on previous year, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Tunisia?
22 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2022.
How do New Caledonia and Tunisia rank globally for wheat — burning crop residues (emissions ch4), annual growth rate?
New Caledonia ranks 129th and Tunisia ranks 128th of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Wheat — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Tunisia: Wheat — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/wheat-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-annual-growth-rate/new-caledonia/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/wheat-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-annual-growth-rate/new-caledonia/tunisia/">New Caledonia vs Tunisia: Wheat — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Wheat — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 8,913 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Wheat — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.