Canada vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Wheat — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4)

Canada
10.94 kt
in 2050
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
21.81 kt
in 2050
Canada rank
9th
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
11th

Wheat — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4) over time

  • Canada
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
510152025196120052050

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 21.81 kt against 10.94 kt in Canada, a difference of 10.87 kt.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 2.0 times Canada's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Canada ahead.

Canada ranks 9th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 11th of 125 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 3 and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 12.23 kt 3.13 kt 9.1 kt Canada
1970s 9.94 kt 3.48 kt 6.45 kt Canada
1980s 14.16 kt 3.31 kt 10.85 kt Canada
1990s 13.08 kt 16.73 kt 3.66 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 10.49 kt 22.62 kt 12.13 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 10.09 kt 23.81 kt 13.73 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 10.79 kt 23.82 kt 13.03 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2030s 10.82 kt 20.95 kt 10.13 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2050s 10.94 kt 21.81 kt 10.87 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher wheat — burning crop residues, Canada or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 21.81 kt against 10.94 kt in Canada as of 2050.
What is the difference in wheat — burning crop residues between Canada and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
10.87 kt, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Canada and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for wheat — burning crop residues?
Canada ranks 9th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 11th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Wheat — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Wheat — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/wheat-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/canada/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/wheat-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/canada/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Canada vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Wheat — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Wheat — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
169 places, 9,743 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).