United Republic of Tanzania vs United States of America: Wheat — Burning crop residues

United Republic of Tanzania
0.0931 kt
in 2050
United States of America
24.01 kt
in 2050
United Republic of Tanzania rank
9th
United States of America rank
10th

Wheat — Burning crop residues over time

  • United Republic of Tanzania
  • United States of America
010203040196120052050

How they compare

United States of America currently reports 24.01 kt against 0.0931 kt in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 23.92 kt.

That makes United States of America's figure about 257.9 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, United States of America has been ahead every year.

United Republic of Tanzania ranks 9th and United States of America ranks 10th of 14 countries.

United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade United Republic of Tanzania United States of America Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0296 kt 21.85 kt 21.82 kt United States of America
1970s 0.0617 kt 25.53 kt 25.47 kt United States of America
1980s 0.0532 kt 28.62 kt 28.56 kt United States of America
1990s 0.0612 kt 26.82 kt 26.76 kt United States of America
2000s 0.0618 kt 22.02 kt 21.96 kt United States of America
2010s 0.0833 kt 19.21 kt 19.12 kt United States of America
2020s 0.0675 kt 16.03 kt 15.96 kt United States of America
2030s 0.0761 kt 23.67 kt 23.59 kt United States of America
2050s 0.0931 kt 24.01 kt 23.92 kt United States of America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher wheat — burning crop residues, United Republic of Tanzania or United States of America?
United States of America, at 24.01 kt against 0.0931 kt in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2050.
What is the difference in wheat — burning crop residues between United Republic of Tanzania and United States of America?
23.92 kt, with United States of America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for United Republic of Tanzania and United States of America?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do United Republic of Tanzania and United States of America rank globally for wheat — burning crop residues?
United Republic of Tanzania ranks 9th and United States of America ranks 10th of 14 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Wheat — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

United Republic of Tanzania vs United States of America: Wheat — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/wheat-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/united-republic-of-tanzania/united-states-of-america/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/wheat-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/united-republic-of-tanzania/united-states-of-america/">United Republic of Tanzania vs United States of America: Wheat — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Wheat — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
169 places, 9,743 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).